 Do selected firms show higher performance? The case of Portugal’s innovation subsidyAnabela Santos Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 2019, vol. 50, issue C, 39-50 Abstract: The paper evaluates the effect of a Portuguese innovation subsidy (SI Innovation), launched in 2007–2013, on firm performance. Using counterfactual analysis methods and a sample composed of firms with approved applications and non-approved ones, the study shows that firms with the best proposals and with higher performance in the pre-intervention period are more likely to receive the subsidy. A positive and sustainable effect of the subsidy, within a time-window of 5 years, on fixed asset investment and technological progress are found. However, it seems that public support has only an effect on the size of investment and not on the decision to invest. Subsidized firms also perform less well than matched non-subsidized ones, and they are less effective in achieving the planned goals concerning labour productivity and value creation. Keywords: Subsidy; Innovation; Firms’ performance (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:streco:v:50:y:2019:i:c:p:39-50 DOI: 10.1016/j.strueco.2019.04.003 Access Statistics for this article Structural Change and Economic Dynamics is currently edited by F. Duchin, H. Hagemann, M. Landesmann, R. Scazzieri, A. Steenge and B. Verspagen More articles in Structural Change and Economic Dynamics from Elsevier |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.