Two- and half-centuries of equilibrium economics: Adam Smith and the evisceration of the spatial dimension from the theory of production
Elias L. Khalil
Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 2025, vol. 74, issue C, 85-91
Abstract:
Two concepts of Smith sealed off the relevance of the mercantilist and physiocratic traditions. Both concepts involve, although in different ways, the evisceration of the spatial dimension from the theory of production. The first, the division of labor, identifies the source of productivity and wealth while disregarding temporal heterogeneity across regions. This disregard produced an equilibrium economics that is, at first approximation, ill-equipped to explain the necessity of the state to protect its region, i.e., the ubiquity of protectionism. The second concept, the productive/unproductive labor distinction, specifies the source of steady growth while disregarding the environmental degradation arising from such growth. This disregard generated an equilibrium economics that is, at first approximation, ill-equipped to explain the necessity of technological and institutional innovations, i.e., the ubiquity of entrepreneurship. To account for both phenomena—i.e., the ubiquity of protectionism and entrepreneurship—we need to incorporate the spatial dimension into production theory.
Keywords: Division of labor; Productive/unproductive labor; Mercantilism; Physiocracy; Neoclassical economics; Economies of scale; Capital accumulation; Sir James Steuart; Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen (the entropy law); Joseph Schumpeter; Piero Sraffa; Exhaustible and environmental resources; Matter/energy flows; Entrepreneurship and innovation; Protectionism; Temporal heterogeneity across regions (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0954349X25000323
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:streco:v:74:y:2025:i:c:p:85-91
DOI: 10.1016/j.strueco.2025.02.016
Access Statistics for this article
Structural Change and Economic Dynamics is currently edited by F. Duchin, H. Hagemann, M. Landesmann, R. Scazzieri, A. Steenge and B. Verspagen
More articles in Structural Change and Economic Dynamics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().