Are living labs effective? Exploring the evidence

Krassimira Paskaleva and Ian Cooper

Technovation, 2021, vol. 106, issue C

Abstract: The main question addressed in this article is whether the evidence that is publicly available validates the claim that Living Labs are an effective means for promoting innovation. Owing to widespread promotion of their usefulness as a practical tool for pursuing innovation, Living Labs have enjoyed increasing attention from researchers, policy-makers and practitioners. But despite the booming interest in Living Labs – where innovation is generally perceived as taking place in real-life environments – their actual performance remains under-researched. It has yet to be demonstrated whether, in practice, Living Labs speed up the design of ‘solutions’ to societal challenges or the sharing of user value. This study aims to assess the existing evidence about whether they really deliver. A broadly based literature review was conducted to discover whether those initiating Living Labs report success – achieving the objectives/benefits they set themselves. Conclusions are drawn about whether the evidence is, at present, strong enough to warrant the promotion this approach receives. We suggest that, despite their 20-year history, the operationalisation of and outcomes from Living Labs are still poorly understood owing to paucity of published evidence, compounded by inadequate research design and insufficient attention to implementing and reporting performance evaluations.

Keywords: Living labs; Innovation; Literature review; Characteristics; Benefits; Evaluation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (10)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166497221000924
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:techno:v:106:y:2021:i:c:s0166497221000924

DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102311

Access Statistics for this article

Technovation is currently edited by Jonathan Linton

More articles in Technovation from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().