Diversification versus specialization in scientific research: Which strategy pays off?

Giovanni Abramo, Ciriaco Andrea D'Angelo and Flavia Di Costa

Technovation, 2019, vol. 82-83, 51-57

Abstract: The current work addresses a theme previously unexplored in the literature: that of whether the results arising from research activity in fields other than the scientist's primary field have greater value than the others. Operationally, the authors proceed by identifying: the scientific production of each researcher under observation; field classification of the publications; the field containing the greatest number of the researcher's publications; attribution of value of each publication. The results show that diversification at the aggregate level does not pay off, although there are some exceptions at the level of individual disciplines. The implications at policy level are notable. Since the incentive systems of research organizations are based on the impact of scientific output, the scientists concerned could resist engaging in multidisciplinary projects.

Keywords: Research strategy; Research evaluation; Research collaboration; Bibliometrics (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (10)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166497217303462
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:techno:v:82-83:y:2019:i::p:51-57

DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2018.06.010

Access Statistics for this article

Technovation is currently edited by Jonathan Linton

More articles in Technovation from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().