Persistent peers and the rhetoric of state economic competition

David L. Schwarzkopf

Technology in Society, 2019, vol. 57, issue C, 46-53

Abstract: State economic development agencies and politicians often express concern about their state's technology-based economic development (TBED) by framing it in terms of a competition with other states. States can focus their competitive efforts if they know who their peers are. Knowing a state's peers also allows development agencies to identify likely targets for borrowing or adapting development practices. This study examines the relative progress of the 50 states on a series of 53 TBED measures published by the National Science Foundation. All states report improvement in over more than half of the variables used in the study, with over 60% of the states moving in the same direction on 80% of the measures. Clusters based on self-organizing maps show 37 states change cluster membership over the measurement period of approximately 12 years, yet all states have at least one “persistent peer”—a state that they are similar with at both the beginning and the end of the period. The combination of large-scale similar movement and the presence of persistent peers sets limits on talk of TBED progress framed by a zero-sum or “leapfrog” rhetoric. Indeed, looking at TBED as a zero-sum game deflects attention from the state's particular strengths and masks the true progress the state has made on its citizens' behalf.

Keywords: Cluster techniques; Economic development; Science and Engineering Indicators; Science and technology reporting; Self-organizing maps (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X18302094
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:teinso:v:57:y:2019:i:c:p:46-53

DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2018.12.001

Access Statistics for this article

Technology in Society is currently edited by Charla Griffy-Brown

More articles in Technology in Society from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().