An assessment of the equality of access and no-regulation approaches to next generation networks
Pedro Pereira and
Telecommunications Policy, 2011, vol. 35, issue 9, 818-826
The European Commission believes that for the regulation of next generation fixed telecommunications networks the continuity approach is preferable to the equality of access approach and the no-regulation approach. According to the European Commission, (i) functional separation eliminates discrimination and promotes competition, but should only be used as a measure of last resort because it involves various complex trade-offs, whereas (ii) the no-regulation approach fosters investment, at the cost of sacrificing competition. The article agrees that functional separation involves complex trade-offs but disputes the assertion that functional separation necessarily eliminates discrimination and promotes competition. In addition, the article also establishes conditions under which the no-regulation approach does not reduce competition.
Keywords: NGN; Continuity approach; No-regulation; Functional separation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:telpol:v:35:y:2011:i:9:p:818-826
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier. ... /30471/bibliographic
Access Statistics for this article
Telecommunications Policy is currently edited by Erik Bohlin
More articles in Telecommunications Policy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dana Niculescu ().