Are public transit investments based on accurate forecasts? An analysis of the improving trend of transit ridership forecasts in the United States

Jawad Mahmud Hoque, Ian Zhang, David Schmitt and Gregory D. Erhardt

Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2024, vol. 186, issue C

Abstract: Historically, forecasts of travel demand on public transit infrastructures have been found to be optimistically biased. However, there has been a lack of data available for statistically significant analysis of factors affecting the accuracy. This paper analyzes the overall trend of transit ridership forecast accuracy in the US and contextualizes it with ridership trends based on the largest yet database of 164 large-scale transit infrastructure projects in the US. We find that transit ridership is about 24.6 % lower than forecast on average with about 70 % of the projects over-predicting ridership. Forecast accuracy varies by mode, service area characteristics, familiarity with transit, ramp up period, and time span. The accuracy has been getting better over the years, particularly after 2000 with the introduction of new analytical and evaluation tools as part of the Capital Investment Grants program. Projects that have been forecasted since 2000 have average ridership about 22 % lower than forecast, compared to about 52 % lower from pre-2000. The steadily improving accuracy, however, is offset by the unexpected decline in transit ridership since 2012. Advent of ride-hailing services and improved socio-economic trends that support auto-oriented cities have prompted this decline in ridership and have affected their forecasts as well. Despite the improving trend, we find that there remains substantial deviation in the outcomes from their forecasts. This points to the need of better scrutiny of model inputs and specifications and how they interact with the built environment to unearth the underlying reasons for inaccuracy. Planners and policymakers may make use of our results to advocate for considering the uncertainty around forecasts for any project and funding decision.

Keywords: Transit ridership forecasts; Forecast accuracy; Uncertainty; Quantile regression (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856424001903
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:transa:v:186:y:2024:i:c:s0965856424001903

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/supportfaq.cws_home/regional
https://shop.elsevie ... _01_ooc_1&version=01

DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2024.104142

Access Statistics for this article

Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice is currently edited by John (J.M.) Rose

More articles in Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().