Between conviction and convenience: Shared social perspectives and shifting intentions among car commuters

Katharina E. Trimmel, Peter Obersteiner, Michael Kriechbaum, Eva Fleiß and Thomas Brudermann

Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2026, vol. 204, issue C

Abstract: Interventions to reduce car use and foster sustainable mobility remain largely unsuccessful as commuters resist mode shifts and oppose restrictive transport policies. To better understand this resistance, we combine a Q methodological analysis and a follow-up quantitative survey (Q2S, n = 947) to discern social perspectives, individual characteristics and mode shift intentions among Austrian car commuters. Findings reveal three distinct car commuter perspectives. Eco-conscious commuters are characterised by strong environmental consciousness and more negative attitudes towards car use but perceive a high degree of car dependence. Car-enthusiastic commuters enjoy the advantages of car use, disregard environmental impacts and resist mode shifts. Pragmatic commuters demonstrate neither high levels of environmental concern nor a high dependence on cars. Instead, their commuting mode choice seems highly influenced by cost-benefit-thinking. Quantitative survey results demonstrate a nearly equal number of supporters for the different perspectives. Support for the car-enthusiastic perspective correlates with positive car attitudes, a conservative political orientation, more car use, stronger car use habits, less concern about climate change, negative views about alternatives and lower mode shift intentions. In contrast, the rating of the eco-conscious perspective shows nearly opposite correlations. The correlations of the rating of the pragmatic perspective follow a similar pattern to those of the eco-conscious perspective but are generally weaker. Overall mode shift intentions are low, underlining the broader systemic issue of a deeply entrenched car-dominant mobility system. This research underscores the complex interplay between individual decision-making and shared meaning in occupational commuting.

Keywords: Sustainable mobility; Mode shifts; Commuting; Q methodology; Q2S; Social perspectives (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096585642500463X
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:transa:v:204:y:2026:i:c:s096585642500463x

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/supportfaq.cws_home/regional
https://shop.elsevie ... _01_ooc_1&version=01

DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2025.104830

Access Statistics for this article

Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice is currently edited by John (J.M.) Rose

More articles in Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().