Flight diversions and recovery decisions: Evidence from China

Bolong Zhou, Kashin Sugishita, Shinya Hanaoka, Enoch Lee and Hai Yang

Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2026, vol. 205, issue C

Abstract: Flight diversions represent a significant challenge to the operational resilience of air transport systems, leading to substantial costs and disruptions for airlines, airports, and passengers. A typical diversion involves two critical stages: alternate landing and subsequent flight recovery. When recovery fails, cancellations not only disrupt airline operations and passenger itineraries but also strain airport ground facilities. This study employs spatial analysis and discrete choice modeling to analyze diversion patterns and recovery outcomes, using a dataset of commercial passenger flight diversions across mainland China. The findings reveal several key insights. First, major airports, particularly those serving as hubs or base airports for airlines, are preferred for alternate landings due to their robust ground support capabilities. While multiple-airport regions (MARs) are strategic receivers of diverted flights, the role of smaller airports within these systems requires further enhancement. Second, the recovery rate of diverted flights is strongly influenced by the airline’s business model. Major full-service carriers (FSCs) demonstrate higher recovery rates, whereas low-cost carriers (LCCs) and non-major carriers are more likely to cancel flights. Third, diversions within MARs significantly reduce recovery rates, underscoring the operational complexities of these regions. These findings offer practical insights for optimizing diversion protocols, enhancing MAR infrastructure, and formulating policies that balance network-wide efficiency with passenger-centric resilience in air transport systems.

Keywords: Flight diversions; Disruption; Airport resilience; Airline discrete choice modelling; Multiple airport regions (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856426000030
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:transa:v:205:y:2026:i:c:s0965856426000030

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/supportfaq.cws_home/regional
https://shop.elsevie ... _01_ooc_1&version=01

DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2026.104862

Access Statistics for this article

Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice is currently edited by John (J.M.) Rose

More articles in Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().