“Bidding the project” vs. “bidding the envelope” in public sector infrastructure procurements
Leonardo J. Basso and
Transport Policy, 2018, vol. 64, issue C, 61-75
We study the relative efficiency of two mechanisms actually employed in large-scale public procurements, often for transportation projects such as roads, bridges and rapid transit systems. In the more common “bidding the project” mechanism, the government specifies the size of the project (a quantity) and firms bid prices (the lowest bid winning). In the “bidding the envelope” mechanism the government specifies what it is willing to spend and firms bid quantities (the highest winning). With uncertainty about project costs and benefits, the much less frequently applied “bidding the envelope” mechanism can lead to higher value for money. Its advantage lies in its ability to allow quantity to adjust to high or low costs.
Keywords: Public infrastructure procurement; Auction mechanisms; Prices vs quantities (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: H57 L98 L32 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:trapol:v:64:y:2018:i:c:p:61-75
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://shop.elsevie ... _01_ooc_1&version=01
Access Statistics for this article
Transport Policy is currently edited by Y. Hayashi
More articles in Transport Policy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dana Niculescu ().