The embodied counterfactual

Fiona Gedeon Achi

World Development, 2020, vol. 127, issue C

Abstract: This short piece focuses on the anthropological quality of the RCT research design to understand the current appeal of experimental approaches to poverty alleviation. Drawing on ethnographic material, this essay discusses how the specificity of RCTs stems from artificially creating an “embodied counterfactual” as the possibility of a different life. It details how the RCT identifies not only a descriptive comparison between two groups but generates parallel realities: what happens with the program and its counterfactual. The counterfactual and the double-present are a trick but, as discussed by several scholars in the social sciences, counterfactual reasoning has long been an important normative tool. Overall, this paper shows that the RCT is a powerful means to imagine and guide the future because it sketches what I conceptualize as “the better life”, in contrast to the good life: improvements which perhaps try to make up in certainty and immediacy the ambition they lack in scope.

Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305750X19304486
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:wdevel:v:127:y:2020:i:c:s0305750x19304486

DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104799

Access Statistics for this article

World Development is currently edited by O. T. Coomes

More articles in World Development from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().