Making evaluation matter: Capturing multiple realities and voices for sustainable development

Sonal Zaveri

World Development, 2020, vol. 127, issue C

Abstract: We measure what we value. While RCTs provide us with precision and statistical rigor, seemingly giving confidence to what works and what does not, they are of limited value for analysing a complex dynamic world system. Various approaches that are people-centric, utilization-focused and forensic in nature have emerged to address deep-seated structural inequalities such as gender, poverty and climate change. Adaptive management recognizes that interventions, and therefore evaluations, must address uncertainties, navigate innovations and simultaneously provide a rigorous understanding of dynamic social change. So the question is not an either/or, suggesting we need a nuanced understanding of what we can and cannot learn from RCTs. Various field interventions are using these emerging methodologies to capture intersectional realities, recognizing contribution rather than just attribution to provide a holistic picture of the nature of social transformation. Such a multi-disciplinary approach to evaluation has a promising future.

Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305750X19304760
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:wdevel:v:127:y:2020:i:c:s0305750x19304760

DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104827

Access Statistics for this article

World Development is currently edited by O. T. Coomes

More articles in World Development from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().