EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Logics of appropriateness: Explaining Chinese Financial Institutions’ weak supervision of overseas financing

Xue Gong

World Development, 2021, vol. 142, issue C

Abstract: Over the past decade, China has moved closer to accepting international infrastructure financing standards and sought to address those environmental and social problems that have occurred in many overseas projects funded by China. These new policies include enhancing the state regulatory regime, requiring the financial entities and infrastructure companies to adopt international best practices, and at the same time revamping various regulations in the financial sector. But, these reforms have not led to any fundamental change in the actual behavior infrastructure companies’ sustainability performance on the ground. This paper addresses the question why the sustainability performance of China’s overseas financing is still ostensibly weak in despite of these government’s efforts. Building on the existing theoretical perspectives, for instance, economic statecraft theory, fragmented authoritarianism model, and governance weaknesses of the host countries, this research seeks to examine the role of China’s policy banks in supervising those infrastructure projects that they have financed. This study looks at three cases of infrastructure financing by China Development Bank and EXIM Bank in Southeast Asian countries in different periods. Drawing theoretical insights from normative institutionalism, this paper contends that the unsatisfactory sustainability performance of Chinese financing continues to take place because decision-making based on the logics of appropriateness-conforming to various informal political norms inside China-has prevented Chinese financiers from making accountable business decisions, leading to their failures in exercising effective oversight of those overseas infrastructure projects. The findings in this paper provide a better understanding of China’s overseas infrastructure development and contribute to the debate on China’s development financing, as well as the Belt and Road Initiative.

Keywords: Chinese infrastructure financing; Chinese development financing; Political norms; Logics of appropriateness; BRI (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305750X21000772
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:wdevel:v:142:y:2021:i:c:s0305750x21000772

DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105465

Access Statistics for this article

World Development is currently edited by O. T. Coomes

More articles in World Development from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2021-06-30
Handle: RePEc:eee:wdevel:v:142:y:2021:i:c:s0305750x21000772