Citizens’ understanding of the social contract: Lessons from Tunisia

Dina Bishara, Michelle Jurkovich and Chantal Berman

World Development, 2023, vol. 168, issue C

Abstract: How do citizens understand state obligation in the provision of social welfare in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA)? Studies of citizen attitudes towards social welfare have focused almost exclusively on countries in the Global North, while scholarship on the social contract in the MENA region has approached the question from a top-down perspective, often viewing social welfare provision as a tool of authoritarian survival. This article examines Tunisians’ perceptions of state obligation in providing two essential socioeconomic needs—food and healthcare. We engage the possibility that two theoretically important predictors of welfare support – namely, education and labor market status – may shape support for different socioeconomic provisions, differently. Analyzing a nationally representative survey fielded in 2017, we find that Tunisians are more likely to blame the state for lack of access to adequate healthcare than lack of access to adequate food. Regression analyses show that education increases Tunisians’ propensity to blame the state for lack of healthcare but exerts no similar effect on their perceptions of state obligation towards ensuring access to adequate food. At the same time, labor market status significantly affects Tunisians’ propensity to blame the state for lack of food (with unemployed individuals and housewives expressing highest levels of blame) but exerts no effect on their perceptions of state obligation toward healthcare provision. We draw on interviews with Tunisian economic and social rights advocates to contextualize and interpret these findings within a broader discussion of the social and political environment surrounding food and healthcare provision in Tunisia. Theoretically, our paper demonstrates the importance of disaggregating citizens’ attitudes towards different forms of welfare provision, and challenges the predominant expectation in welfare opinion studies that the self-interest mechanism will drive support for state provision across diverse socioeconomic concerns.

Keywords: Social contract; Human rights; Tunisia; Health; Food; Social welfare; Middle East and North Africa (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305750X22003539
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:wdevel:v:168:y:2023:i:c:s0305750x22003539

DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2022.106163

Access Statistics for this article

World Development is currently edited by O. T. Coomes

More articles in World Development from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().