Aid Allocation through Various Official and Private Channels: Need, Merit, and Self-Interest as Motives of German Donors
Peter Nunnenkamp and
Hannes Öhler ()
World Development, 2011, vol. 39, issue 3, 308-323
Abstract:
Summary The previous literature largely ignores the heterogeneity of aid channels used by each single donor country. We estimate Tobit models to assess the relative importance of recipient need, merit, and self-interest of donors for various channels of official and private German aid across a large sample of recipient countries in 2005-07. Our findings underscore the need for a disaggregated analysis of aid allocation. Aid channels differ significantly in the extent to which need and merit are taken into account. Yet, the German case does not reveal unambiguously superior aid channels.
Keywords: aid; allocation; aid; channels; donor; motives; Germany; Tobit; models (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (45)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305-750X(10)00138-5
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
Working Paper: Aid Allocation through Various Official and Private Channels: Need, Merit and Self-Interest as Motives of German Donors (2010) 
Working Paper: Aid Allocation through Various Official and Private Channels: Need, Merit and Self-Interest as Motives of German Donors (2009) 
Working Paper: Aid allocation through various official and private channels: need, merit and self-interest as motives of German donors (2009) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:wdevel:v:39:y:2011:i:3:p:308-323
Access Statistics for this article
World Development is currently edited by O. T. Coomes
More articles in World Development from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().