The Good Governance Indicators of the Millennium Challenge Account: How Many Dimensions are Really Being Measured?

Martin Knoll and Petra Zloczysti

World Development, 2012, vol. 40, issue 5, 900-915

Abstract: This paper assesses the validity of the perception-based governance indicators used by the US Millennium Challenge Account (MCA) for aid allocation decisions. By conducting Explanatory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis of data from 1996 to 2009, we find that although the MCA purports to measure seven distinct dimensions of governance, only two discrete underlying dimensions, the perceived “participatory dimension of governance” and the perceived “overall quality of governance,” can be identified. Our results also show that some of the doubts that have been raised concerning the validity of perception-based governance indicators are less warranted when the indicators are applied exclusively to developing countries.

Keywords: aid allocation; governance indicators; Factor Analysis; MCA; United States (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (13)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305750X11002944
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
Working Paper: The Good Governance Indicators of the Millennium Challenge Account: How Many Dimensions Are Really Being Measured? (2011)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:wdevel:v:40:y:2012:i:5:p:900-915

DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.11.010

Access Statistics for this article

World Development is currently edited by O. T. Coomes

More articles in World Development from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().