EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Do within-subject standardized indices of societal culture distort reality? An illustration with the national Tightness culture scale

Sunil Venaik, David F. Midgley and Demetris Christopoulos

Journal of World Business, 2021, vol. 56, issue 5

Abstract: Within-subject standardization is a common practice in cross-cultural research to remove presumed acquiescence bias in the data. However, there is limited understanding of the implications of this procedure, including the potential to amplify and misrepresent the true range of the variable of interest, and to create spurious relationships with other variables. We illustrate the problems with this procedure using the Gelfand et al. (2011) national Tightness-Looseness data. We advance the opposite-items approach as a better way to identify and correct for acquiescence bias in survey data, and also suggest the Tightness-Looseness index of Uz (2015) as an alternative measure of this particular dimension of national culture. Overall, we need more research with other cross-cultural scales and data to better understand the implications of the popular within-subject standardization procedure for IB theory, pedagogy, practice, and policy.

Keywords: Cross-cultural research; National Tightness-Looseness culture; Within-subject standardization; Acquiescence bias (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090951621000547
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:worbus:v:56:y:2021:i:5:s1090951621000547

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/620401/bibliographic
http://www.elsevier. ... 620401/bibliographic

DOI: 10.1016/j.jwb.2021.101242

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of World Business is currently edited by David Collings and Jonathan Doh

More articles in Journal of World Business from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:worbus:v:56:y:2021:i:5:s1090951621000547