Response from an Economist Who Also Favors Liberty
James Galbraith ()
Additional contact information
James Galbraith: LBJ School, University of Texas
Eastern Economic Journal, 2001, vol. 27, issue 2, 227-229
Economists can to some extent enlighten policymakers and the public and influence public policy. That enlightenment is achieved more by concrete policy work and application of basics than by fancy models and fancy statistical significance. There is a trade-off between relevance/importance and rigor/precision. Because many economists concentrate on rigor and precision, their influence in public affairs is not as good as it could be. The professional emphasis on scholastic crafts forsakes the Smithian character of political economy. A more Smithian character for the economics profession would lead to better government policy. The primary article by Daniel B. Klein is followed by comments by Gordon Tullock, Deirdre McCloskey, Israel M. Kirzner, C.A.E. Goodhart, Robert H. Frank and James K. Galbraith and a rejoinder by Daniel B. Klein.
JEL-codes: A11 A13 H00 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eej:eeconj:v:27:y:2001:i:2:p:227-229
Access Statistics for this article
Eastern Economic Journal is currently edited by Cynthia A. Bansak, St. Lawrence University and Allan A. Zebedee, Clarkson University
More articles in Eastern Economic Journal from Eastern Economic Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Victor Matheson, College of the Holy Cross ().