EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

John M. Clark's Concept of Too Strong Competition: The U.S. Cement Industry as a Possible Case

Gerald Aranoff
Additional contact information
Gerald Aranoff: Jerusalem College of Technology

Eastern Economic Journal, 1991, vol. 17, issue 1, 45-60

Abstract: The principal hypothesis of this paper is that the U.S. cement industry for most of the sixties and seventies can serve as an instance of John M. Clark's concept of too strong competition. This paper argues that the mainstream academic view--notably that of S. M. Loescher and F. M. Scherer--mischaracterizes the cement industry of 1909-46 due to methodological and data errors. The paper presents evidence that during periods of capacity surplus in the sixties and early seventies cement profit margins were inadequate, despite generally good economic years, and this contributed to reduced investment in the seventies and eighties and to a severe capacity shortages during 1972-73 and 1978-79.

Keywords: Cement (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: L11 L61 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1991
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://web.holycross.edu/RePEc/eej/Archive/Volume17/V17N1P45_60.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eej:eeconj:v:17:y:1991:i:1:p:45-60

Access Statistics for this article

Eastern Economic Journal is currently edited by Cynthia A. Bansak, St. Lawrence University and Allan A. Zebedee, Clarkson University

More articles in Eastern Economic Journal from Eastern Economic Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Victor Matheson, College of the Holy Cross ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eej:eeconj:v:17:y:1991:i:1:p:45-60