A Note on the Bounded Solution of the Bilateral Monopoly Model
Chin Yang
Additional contact information
Chin Yang: Clarion University
Eastern Economic Journal, 1991, vol. 17, issue 3, 367-372
Abstract:
As is well known in the bilateral monopoly model, the solution regarding the price of the intermediate product cannot be determined uniquely. In this note, the author proposes a new solution that has narrower solution bound than that suggested by J. M. Henderson and R. E. Quandt (1971). Furthermore, these solutions are shown to be special cases of a generalized goal programming model with conflicting objectives between two monopolists. It was shown that with more information on taxes or preference weights, the solution range can be greatly improved.
Keywords: Bilateral Monopoly; Monopolists; Monopoly (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: B31 O34 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1991
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://web.holycross.edu/RePEc/eej/Archive/Volume17/V17N3P367_372.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eej:eeconj:v:17:y:1991:i:3:p:367-372
Access Statistics for this article
Eastern Economic Journal is currently edited by Cynthia A. Bansak, St. Lawrence University and Allan A. Zebedee, Clarkson University
More articles in Eastern Economic Journal from Eastern Economic Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Victor Matheson, College of the Holy Cross ().