Poverty, Inequality, and the Role of Government: What Would Adam Smith Say?

Sandy Baum
Additional contact information
Sandy Baum: Skidmore College

Eastern Economic Journal, 1992, vol. 18, issue 2, 143-156

Abstract: This paper uses Smith's views on the distribution of income and poverty to support the argument that Smith's advocacy of laissez-faire was limited and historically specific. It discusses the relevance of these views in providing philosophical underpinning for modern social policy. Examination of Smith's ideas using the frameworks of several modern theoretical constructs, including Rawlsian justice, interdependent utility functions, countervailing power, and the theory of the second best, helps to make this link between eighteenth century thought and twentieth century policy analysis.

Keywords: Poverty (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: B31 I30 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1992
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
http://web.holycross.edu/RePEc/eej/Archive/Volume18/V18N2P143_156.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eej:eeconj:v:18:y:1992:i:2:p:143-156

Access Statistics for this article

Eastern Economic Journal is currently edited by Cynthia A. Bansak, St. Lawrence University and Allan A. Zebedee, Clarkson University

More articles in Eastern Economic Journal from Eastern Economic Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Victor Matheson, College of the Holy Cross ().