 On the (Im)possibility of Market SocialismEastern Economic Journal, 1993, vol. 19, issue 3, 333-344 Abstract: This paper explores the question of whether socialism and inflexibility are interlinked and hence, whether a Market Socialism is at all feasible. The linchpin in this thesis is the capital market, coupled with what Kornai has termed the "soft budget constraint." The commitment to social ownership of capital is a commitment to an exclusion of the private sector from the ownership of productive resources. It puts the firm under the control of a public hierarchy, and the key question is whether this hierarchy can simulate the capital market. It is argued that this cannot be done. This impossibility leads to the soft budget constraint. The firm is then freed from the need to fight for its continued existence through the unceasing search for profits. As a result, it becomes less sensitive to market signals, its supply response to price changes and to changes in demand is less elastic and, as a result, the hierarchy finds it necessary to balance the market. Keywords: Socialism (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eej:eeconj:v:19:y:1993:i:3:p:333-344 Access Statistics for this article Eastern Economic Journal is currently edited by Cynthia A. Bansak, St. Lawrence University and Allan A. Zebedee, Clarkson University More articles in Eastern Economic Journal from Eastern Economic Association Contact information at EDIRC. |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.