An Essay on the Origin of the Rational Utility Maximization Hypothesis and a Suggested Modification

Ken McCormick

Eastern Economic Journal, 1997, vol. 23, issue 1, 17-30

Abstract: The rational utility maximization hypothesis (RUMH) was not always a part of economics. Most Classical economists believed that people are influenced by passions as well as by reason. The RUMH became a central part of economics when mathematics became a primary tool of analysis. This was not a coincidence, as the change in method led to the ascendancy of the RUMH. Motivated by recent experimental evidence, it is suggested that the marginal trader hypothesis be invoked to allow a modification of the RUMH: When arbitrage is possible, only a small fraction of market participants need be assumed rational.

Keywords: Utility (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: B10 B21 D11 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1997
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://web.holycross.edu/RePEc/eej/Archive/Volume23/V23N1P17_30.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eej:eeconj:v:23:y:1997:i:1:p:17-30

Access Statistics for this article

Eastern Economic Journal is currently edited by Cynthia A. Bansak, St. Lawrence University and Allan A. Zebedee, Clarkson University

More articles in Eastern Economic Journal from Eastern Economic Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Victor Matheson, College of the Holy Cross ().