Waiting to Execute: An Optimal Stopping Model of Capital Punishment Stays

Catherine Chambers and Paul Chambers ()
Additional contact information
Catherine Chambers: Central Missouri State University
Paul Chambers: Department of Economics and Finance, Central Missouri State University

Eastern Economic Journal, 2004, vol. 30, issue 2, 259-272

Abstract: The focus of this paper is on a specific component of the capital punishment debate: delays in capital punishment. Although the legal justifications for delays in capital punishment cases, such as the right of the writ of habeas corpus, are well known, the analysis of the economic costs and benefits of delaying executions is limited. Fluctuations in the political consensus regarding capital punishment and resulting changes in the imposition of the death penalty in practice suggest that such costs and benefits are important to policymakers. The employment of option value theory is useful when considering the implementation of the death penalty because it involves an action that has uncertain net benefits and that is irreversible.

Keywords: Punishment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: K42 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2004
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://web.holycross.edu/RePEc/eej/Archive/Volume30/V30N2P259_272.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eej:eeconj:v:30:y:2004:i:2:p:259-272

Access Statistics for this article

Eastern Economic Journal is currently edited by Cynthia A. Bansak, St. Lawrence University and Allan A. Zebedee, Clarkson University

More articles in Eastern Economic Journal from Eastern Economic Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Victor Matheson, College of the Holy Cross ().