Adam Smith’s Impartial Spectator: Symposium Remarks

Samuel Fleischacker

Econ Journal Watch, 2016, vol. 13, issue 2, 273–283

Abstract: I argue that Adam Smith’s impartial spectator should be regarded as an eminently human figure, not an ideal beyond ordinary people’s reach, let alone an emblem of the divine. This reading makes best sense of how the figure functions in The Theory of Moral Sentiments, enables Smith to construct a plausible version of moral sentimentalism, and gives him a response to a problem he saw in David Hume’s sentimentalism. The reading also makes it somewhat difficult for Smith to give a satisfying response to the dangers of cultural relativism, but that problem, I argue, his system shares with most other moral philosophies.

Keywords: Adam Smith; Theory of Moral Sentiments; impartial spectator; philosophy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: A13 B12 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://econjwatch.org/File+download/923/FleischackerMay2016.pdf?mimetype=pdf (application/pdf)
https://econjwatch.org/1030 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ejw:journl:v:13:y:2016:i:2:p:273-283

Access Statistics for this article

Econ Journal Watch is currently edited by Daniel Klein

More articles in Econ Journal Watch from Econ Journal Watch Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Jason Briggeman ().