Fads and Trends in OECD Economic Thinking on Denmark: A Word-Frequency Approach

Thomas Andersen

Econ Journal Watch, 2019, vol. 16, issue 2, 218–238

Abstract: As the post-2008 macroeconomic debate has reminded us, economics is not a cumulative science moving ever closer to truth. The fundamental ideas that shape economic arguments are prone to sporadic fads and more persistent trends. I use the frequency of certain words in the OECD Economic Surveys of Denmark to gain quantitative perspective on how policy relevant ideas in economics change. In the 1960s and 1970s, for example, “demand management” and “incomes policy” enjoyed high frequency in the Surveys, but they had all but vanished by 1990. In the 1990s the natural rate hypothesis had replaced the Keynesian framework, and “structural unemployment” suddenly became much more frequent. Special focus was placed on the incentive effects on labor supply of generous unemployment benefits and high marginal income taxes. Prior to 1990 “incentives” was little used, but its usage rose greatly thereafter. In the late 1990s “structural reform” became very fashionable. After the 2008 financial crisis the Surveys began to talk of “macroprudential” policies. Like incomes policy, macroprudential policy is premised on the belief that policymakers should be ready to intervene to curb what is perceived as unsustainable price developments. In this respect the Surveys have come full circle.

Keywords: OECD; economic ideas; economic policy; text mining (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: B2 F5 N1 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://econjwatch.org/File+download/1124/AndersenSept2019.pdf?mimetype=pdf (application/pdf)
https://econjwatch.org/1172 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ejw:journl:v:16:y:2019:i:2:p:218-238

Access Statistics for this article

Econ Journal Watch is currently edited by Daniel Klein

More articles in Econ Journal Watch from Econ Journal Watch Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Jason Briggeman ().