Do Economists Reach a Conclusion on Free-Banking Episodes?
Ignacio Briones and
Hugh Rockoff ()
Econ Journal Watch, 2005, vol. 2, issue 2, 279-324
How should banks be regulated? Must governments tightly regulate banks to prevent financial panics, or is little or no regulation best? Can private banks be trusted to issue paper money or must this activity be a government monopoly? Theory can help answer these questions, but increasingly in recent years economists have turned to the natural experiments of history to find out how well free banking systems, or more accurately lightly regulated banking systems, have worked in practice. We now have numerous studies of lightly regulated banking in Scotland, the United States, Canada, and many other countries. As usual, research has produced new questions and heated controversies. The resulting ruckus tends to obscure the areas in which research has produced a consensus. Here we try to separate the areas where there is a consensus from areas where research is still in its early stages.
Keywords: free banking; convertibility; bank regulation; lender of last resort; banking stability; historical experiences (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E42 E51 E58 G21 G28 G29 N20 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
https://econjwatch.org/File+download/79/2005-08-br ... ncl.pdf?mimetype=pdf (application/pdf)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ejw:journl:v:2:y:2005:i:2:p:279-324
Access Statistics for this article
Econ Journal Watch is currently edited by Daniel Klein
More articles in Econ Journal Watch from Econ Journal Watch Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Jason Briggeman ().