Decline in Critical Commentary, 1963â€“2004
Philip Coelho (),
Frederick De Worken-Eley and
Econ Journal Watch, 2005, vol. 2, issue 2, 355-361
Over the past four decades, top economics journals have virtually eliminated critical commentary (comments, replies, rejoinders, and the like). This article shows the data and discusses these steep declines in critical commentary. To the extent that critical commentary is beneficial to scientific inquiry, editorial opposition to critical commentary is detrimental to the advancement of economic knowledge.
Keywords: Critical commentary; scientific inquiry; debate; editorial policy; prejudice; error; reliability; animosity; vanity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: A10 A11 B40 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
https://econjwatch.org/File+download/82/2005-08-co ... ice.pdf?mimetype=pdf (application/pdf)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ejw:journl:v:2:y:2005:i:2:p:355-361
Access Statistics for this article
Econ Journal Watch is currently edited by Daniel Klein
More articles in Econ Journal Watch from Econ Journal Watch Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Jason Briggeman ().