Second Reply to Bergh

Peter Lindert

Econ Journal Watch, 2006, vol. 3, issue 3, 461-465

Abstract: I AM PLEASED THAT IN HIS SECOND COMMENT ANDREAS BERGH (2006b) has decided to “try even harder to recur to the facts,†and agrees that on the key econometric front our “actual disagreement is very small†(pp. 452, 453). He also now reveals that he is “in fact rather friendly to the welfare state.†We seem to have achieved some convergence.

Date: 2006
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://econjwatch.org/File+download/130/2006-09-lindert-com.pdf?mimetype=pdf (application/pdf)
https://econjwatch.org/228 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ejw:journl:v:3:y:2006:i:3:p:461-465

Access Statistics for this article

Econ Journal Watch is currently edited by Daniel Klein

More articles in Econ Journal Watch from Econ Journal Watch Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Jason Briggeman ().