Do Economists Reach a Conclusion on Subsidies for Sports Franchises, Stadiums, and Mega-Events?

Dennis Coates and Brad Humphreys

Econ Journal Watch, 2008, vol. 5, issue 3, 294-315

Abstract: This paper reviews the empirical literature assessing the effects of subsidies for professional sports franchises and facilities. The evidence reveals a great deal of consistency among economists doing research in this area. That evidence is that sports subsidies cannot be justified on the grounds of local economic development, income growth or job creation, those arguments most frequently used by subsidy advocates. The paper also relates survey evidence showing that economists in general oppose sports subsidies. In addition to reviewing the empirical literature, we describe the economic intuition that probably underlies the strong consensus among economists against sports subsidies.

Keywords: sports; subsidies; stadiums; arenas (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: H2 H4 L83 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2008
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (70)

Downloads: (external link)
https://econjwatch.org/File+download/222/2008-09-c ... com.pdf?mimetype=pdf (application/pdf)
https://econjwatch.org/276 (text/html)

Related works:
Working Paper: Do Economists Reach a Conclusion on Subsidies for Sports Franchises, Stadiums, and Mega-Events? (2008)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ejw:journl:v:5:y:2008:i:3:p:294-315

Access Statistics for this article

Econ Journal Watch is currently edited by Daniel Klein

More articles in Econ Journal Watch from Econ Journal Watch Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Jason Briggeman (jason@briggeman.org).