The Persistence of Mutual Funds Performance: Evidence From The UK Stock Market

Dimitris Kenourgios and Ioannis Petropoulos
Additional contact information
Ioannis Petropoulos: Department of Economics and Finance, Brunel University

Ekonomia, 2004, vol. 7, issue 2, 121-138

Abstract: This paper examines the past performances of mutual funds as a criterion for investors’ future choices. In particular, it examines if mutual funds (which invested in the U.K stock market) that have presented the highest return through one or two years continue the same high performances through the future years. We start our analysis by calculating the annually returns of all funds and the Jensen’s measure of performance (in the context of CAPM). Moreover, we test persistence by constructing two-way tables showing the successful performance over successive two-year and one year period. Afterwards, we simulate a strategy of investing in the top performing mutual funds during the preceding two years. We conclude that in 1990s persistence is weak. We do not find strong evidence that past returns provide information about future returns. As most of the results in relevant studies, our results may be subject to survivorship bias, because we do not include in our sample funds that have ceased to exist or merged or started their operation after 1990 (they do not have complete observations).

JEL-codes: C22 G12 G14 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2004
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ekn:ekonom:v:7:y:2004:i:2:p:121-138

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Ekonomia from Cyprus Economic Society and University of Cyprus Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Managing Editor ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).