A fiscal paradox and post-Keynesian economics: a comment on Palley

Thomas Michl

Review of Keynesian Economics, 2014, vol. 2, issue 1, 108-115

Abstract: This paper corrects an error in Palley (2013) and offers an alternative interpretation of the difference between Cambridge and Kaleckian growth models. Using a Cambridge model with a variable profit share and full utilization of capital, a fiscal transfer from capitalists to workers is shown to increase (not decrease as Palley wrote) the capitalist share of wealth and to increase the profit share enough to impoverish workers, creating a type of transfer paradox. A balanced budget spending program financed with a tax on capitalists also has this effect. These results dramatize the fact that the Cambridge model confronts the distributional conflicts that the Kaleckian models are able to overlook by virtue of their assumption that the output–capital ratio (the utilization rate) is a free variable.

Keywords: distribution; growth; Cambridge; neo-Kaleckian; fiscal policy; transfer paradox (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.elgaronline.com/view/journals/roke/2-1/roke.2014.01.06.xml (application/pdf)
Restricted access

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:elg:rokejn:v:2:y:2014:i:1:p108-115

Access Statistics for this article

Review of Keynesian Economics is currently edited by Thomas Palley, Matías Vernengo and Esteban Pérez Caldentey

More articles in Review of Keynesian Economics from Edward Elgar Publishing
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Phillip Thompson ().