Keynesian parables of thrift and hoarding
Nicholas Rowe
Review of Keynesian Economics, 2016, vol. 4, issue 1, 50-55
Abstract:
I argue that Keynes missed seeing the importance of the distinction between saving in the form of money ('hoarding') and saving in all other forms ('thrift'). It is excessive hoarding, not excessive thrift, that causes recessions and the failure of Say's law. The same failure to distinguish hoarding from thrift continues from The General Theory into the IS–LM model and into New Keynesian macroeconomics. On this particular question, economists should follow Silvio Gesell rather than John Maynard Keynes. The rate of interest in New Keynesian models should be interpreted as a negative Gesellian tax (that is, a subsidy) on holding money issued by the central bank.
Keywords: Keynes; Gesell; saving; thrift; hoarding; deficient demand; money; monetary exchange; barter (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E12 E21 E32 E41 E52 E58 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.elgaronline.com/abstract/journals/roke/4-1/roke.2016.01.05.xml (application/pdf)
Restricted access
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:elg:rokejn:v:4:y:2016:i:1:p50-55
Access Statistics for this article
Review of Keynesian Economics is currently edited by Thomas Palley, MatÃas Vernengo and Esteban Pérez Caldentey
More articles in Review of Keynesian Economics from Edward Elgar Publishing
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Phillip Thompson ().