Wage-led versus profit-led demand regimes: the long and the short of it
Robert Blecker ()
Review of Keynesian Economics, 2016, vol. 4, issue 4, 373-390
Empirical studies have found mixed results regarding whether various countries have wage-led or profit-led demand regimes. Most of the previous literature has paid little attention to the time dimension of this distinction, but most of the studies that have found profit-led results have used methodologies that emphasize short-run cyclical relationships. This paper argues that demand is more likely to be profit-led in the short run and more likely to be wage-led in the longer term, because the positive effects of lower labor costs on investment and net exports are likely to be strongest in the short run, while the positive effects of a higher wage share on consumption are likely to be strongest in the longer term, at least in the US case (other countries may differ).
Keywords: neo-Kaleckian models; growth and distribution; wage-led growth; profit-led growth; Bhaduriâ€“Marglin (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D33 E12 E32 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (37) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Working Paper: Wage-led Versus Profit-led Demand Regimes: The Long and Short of It (2015)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:elg:rokejn:v:4:y:2016:i:4:p373-390
Access Statistics for this article
Review of Keynesian Economics is currently edited by Thomas Palley, MatÃas Vernengo and Esteban PÃ©rez Caldentey
More articles in Review of Keynesian Economics from Edward Elgar Publishing
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Phillip Thompson ().