Weaknesses of 'wage-led growth'

Peter Skott

Review of Keynesian Economics, 2017, vol. 5, issue 3, 336-359

Abstract: The emphasis in post-Keynesian macroeconomics on wage- versus profit-led growth may not have been helpful. The profit share is not an exogenous variable, and the correlations between the profit share and economic growth can be positive for some exogenous shocks but negative for others. The terminology, second, suggests a unidirectional causality from distribution to aggregate demand while in fact distribution can itself be directly affected by shifts in aggregate demand. The reduced form correlations, third, depend on interactions with the labor market, and a focus on the goods market can be misleading. If, fourth, empirical estimates are taken at face value, the support for wage-led conclusions is much weaker than suggested by the literature. A focus on the growth benefits of a reduction in inequality, finally, makes for an impoverished policy discussion.

Keywords: investment; saving; income distribution; Lucas critique; Marglin–Bhaduri model (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E2 O41 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (22)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.elgaronline.com/abstract/journals/roke/5-3/roke.2017.03.03.xml (application/pdf)
Restricted access

Related works:
Working Paper: Weaknesses of 'wage-led growth' (2016)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:elg:rokejn:v:5:y:2017:i:3:p336-359

Access Statistics for this article

Review of Keynesian Economics is currently edited by Thomas Palley, Matías Vernengo and Esteban Pérez Caldentey

More articles in Review of Keynesian Economics from Edward Elgar Publishing
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Phillip Thompson ().