EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The use of dichotomies in introductory economics

Mathieu Dufour and Ian Seda-Irizarry
Additional contact information
Mathieu Dufour: Associate Professor, Département des sciences sociales, Université du Québec en Outaouais, Canada

Review of Keynesian Economics, 2017, vol. 5, issue 4, 519–532

Abstract: The explanation of complex issues usually requires techniques that imply some sort of abstraction. In economics, and popular discourse in general, dichotomies are an example of such devices. Be it the opposition between monetary and real phenomena, free trade and protectionism, or idealism and materialism, dichotomies are pervasive heuristic techniques. Students taking introductory courses in economics come with preconceived ideas that are, in many senses, shaped by dichotomies, which makes them a useful but tricky teaching tool. In this article, we outline a way to make use of this to transcend these priors and foster critical thinking, using one of the prominent dichotomies, that between the market and the state.

Keywords: dichotomies; state; market; Smith; Keynes; Marx (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: A2 A22 B00 Y2 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.elgaronline.com/view/journals/roke/5-4/roke.2017.04.03.xml (application/pdf)
Restricted access

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:elg:rokejn:v:5:y:2017:i:4:p519-532

Access Statistics for this article

Review of Keynesian Economics is currently edited by Thomas Palley, Matías Vernengo and Esteban Pérez Caldentey

More articles in Review of Keynesian Economics from Edward Elgar Publishing
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Phillip Thompson ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-31
Handle: RePEc:elg:rokejn:v:5:y:2017:i:4:p519-532