América Latina y el Sudeste Asiático. Dos modelos de desarrollo, pero la misma “trampa del ingreso medio”: rentas fáciles crean élites indolentes

José Gabriel Palma () and Jonathan Pincus
Additional contact information
Jonathan Pincus: UNDP

El Trimestre Económico, 2022, vol. 89 (2), issue 354, 613-681

Abstract: The success of some early Asian emerging countries such as Korea, Taiwan, Singapore, and Hong Kong, followed by China and India since 1980, has raised the bar for developing economies. However, other Asian emerging countries, like those from Southeast Asia, including Malaysia, Thailand, Indonesia, and now Viet Nam, have not yet been able to replicate the performance of their Asian predecessors. Could it be that they are already experiencing the problems of a Latin American-style “middle-income trap”? In these two regions, the common factor has been the inability to “upgrade” their growth strategies when the existing ones have run their course and become counterproductive. The “middle-income trap” indicates that productivity growth is more difficult to sustain at higher and more complex stage of the catching-up process. While Latin American countries have exhausted their purely extractive development model (and productivity growth has stalled for decades), Southeast Asian ones have failed to recapture their pre-1997 high growth trajectories as they have been priced out of labor-intensive activities. This paper analyses how the “more of the same but hopefully better” supply-side-strategy that many mainstream economists and trade agreements focus on is the wrong solution for escaping the “trap”; instead, middle-income countries facing a slowdown in productivity growth should reengineer existing development strategies. Matching the performance of the above-mentioned countries requires a conscious, national-level strategy to promote investment in activities with higher long-term potentials for productivity growth, especially higher value-added manufactured exports. The main policy implication of this analysis is that Latin America must reignite productivity growth by adding value to their commodity exports and strengthening backward linkages of export products and services, while Southeast Asian countries should “deepen” their assembly operations in manufacturing. Nicholas Kaldor’s argument that manufacturing has the greatest scope to realize increasing returns to scale remains true, even in today’s decentralized, fragmented manufacturing systems, but the limited size of domestic markets means that middle-income countries must prioritize manufactured exports using all of the policy instruments still available to them.

Keywords: Middle-income trap; productivity; employment growth; Latin America; Southeast Asia. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E2 N10 O11 O47 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.eltrimestreeconomico.com.mx/index.php/te/article/view/1509

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:elt:journl:v:89:y:2022:i:354:p:613-681

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Order print issues directly in our web page or with Guadalupe Galicia at Fondo de Cultura Económica, El Trimestre Económico, Carretera Picacho Ajusco 227, 2° piso, Col. Bosques del Pedregal, CP 14738, Tlalpan, Ciudad de México
http://www.eltrimestreeconomico.com.mx

DOI: 10.20430/ete.v89i354.1509

Access Statistics for this article

El Trimestre Económico is currently edited by Orlando Delgado Selley, Saúl Escobar Toledo, Jorge Isaac Egurrola and José Valenzuela Feijóo

More articles in El Trimestre Económico from Fondo de Cultura Económica
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Nuria Pliego Vinageras ().