The influence of organisational culture on corporate accountants' ethical judgement and ethical intention in Vietnam

Lan Anh Nguyen, Steven Dellaportas, Gillian Maree Vesty, Pham Van Anh Thi, Lilibeth Jandug and Eva Tsahuridu

Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 2021, vol. 35, issue 2, 325-354

Abstract: Purpose - This research examines the impact of organisational culture on the ethical judgement and ethical intention of corporate accountants in Vietnam. Design/methodology/approach - The study relies on survey data collected from 283 practising accountants in Vietnam. Organisational culture was measured using the Organisational Culture Assessment Instrument, developed by Cameron and Quinn (2011). The Instrument is developed based on the competing values framework comprised of four distinct cultures: clan, hierarchy, market and adhocracy. Ethical judgement and ethical intention were measured based on respondent responses to five ethical scenarios, each linked to a principle of professional conduct in the code of ethics. Findings - The findings indicate that the clan culture (family oriented) is dominant and has a significant positive influence on accountants' ethical judgement and ethical intention. Respondents in the clan culture evaluate scenarios more ethically compared with accountants in the adhocracy and market cultures but not the hierarchy culture. Accountants who emphasise the adhocracy and market cultures display a more relaxed attitude towards unethical scenarios whereas respondents in the hierarchy culture (rule oriented) display the highest ethical attitude. Research limitations/implications - The code of ethics, its content and how it is interpreted and applied may differ between professions, organisations or cultures. Originality/value - Organisational research on ethical decision-making is ample but few studies link organisational culture with ethical judgement and ethical intention from the perspective of individual accountants.

Keywords: Organisational culture; Ethical judgement; Ethical intention; Ethical decision-making; Code of ethics; Vietnam (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.110 ... d&utm_campaign=repec (text/html)
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.110 ... d&utm_campaign=repec (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eme:aaajpp:aaaj-05-2020-4573

DOI: 10.1108/AAAJ-05-2020-4573

Access Statistics for this article

Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal is currently edited by Prof James Guthrie and Prof Lee Parker

More articles in Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal from Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Emerald Support ().