Content and context: “fair” values in China
Ferdinand Balfoort,
Rachel Francis Baskerville and
Rolf Uwe Fülbier
Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 2017, vol. 30, issue 2, 352-377
Abstract:
Purpose - The evolution of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) was nurtured by economists and accountants loyal to the philosophical basis of what is often referred to as “Western” market economies, being classical and neoclassical contracting theories. The purpose of this paper is to illustrate how a particular Asian cultural attribute (guānxì) impacts on the efficacy of fair value measurement. Design/methodology/approach - Using a literature review and research of studies of the adoption of IFRS in China, studies of bothguānxìand fair value in Chinese accounting research, this study unbundles Williamson’s governance structure and contracting theory to examine howguānxìis positioned orthogonally to fair value (market-oriented valuation) principles for financial reporting. This is followed by a case study of the events surrounding the collapse of China Medical Technologies. Findings - Guānxìis integral to Asian economies and economic transactions. Resulting conditions, characterised by relational contracting, may not meet the qualitative characteristics of neutrality and faithful representation in fair value measurement of assets and liabilities. The same may be true when insider or “trusted party transaction” values prevail for large ticket transactions among entities in any jurisdiction. Research limitations/implications - Future research on the impact ofguānxìmay be constrained by its often hidden, and yet dynamic, character; and the varieties of its manifestations. Originality/value - This study highlights how difficult it may be to achieve both comparability and relevance in the asset and liability recognition and measurement rules in Asian (and possibly also other) economies adopting accounting principles that are developed in a Western context.
Keywords: China; IFRS; IASB; Transaction cost economics; Relational contracting; Guānxì (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.110 ... d&utm_campaign=repec (text/html)
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.110 ... d&utm_campaign=repec (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eme:aaajpp:aaaj-08-2014-1807
DOI: 10.1108/AAAJ-08-2014-1807
Access Statistics for this article
Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal is currently edited by Prof James Guthrie and Prof Lee Parker
More articles in Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal from Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Emerald Support ().