Accountability re‐examined: evidence from Hull House
Leslie S. Oakes and
Joni J. Young
Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 2008, vol. 21, issue 6, 765-790
Abstract:
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to re‐examine accountability in a concrete historical context from the perspective of pragmatism and feminist theory. Design/methodology/approach - An archival case study of Hull House. Findings - Both pragmatism and feminist theory of Benhabib provide new insight into alternative conceptions of accountability, conceptions at odds with the prevailing and dominant emphasis on quantitative measures of performance. Further, this paper suggests that this limited view severely narrows the understanding of organizational “success.” Research limitations/implications - While this research serves to problematize notions of accountability further, it leaves the task of developing alternative practices to future researchers. Originality/value - This paper contributes in two ways: first, there is a paucity of research linking pragmatism to the actual workings of concrete organizations. This paper begins to fill that gap. Second, this work draws the attention of accounting and other organizational researchers to the important role played by the settlement movement, and particularly Hull House, in the development of contemporary organizations.
Keywords: Non‐profit organizations; Accounting history; Pragmatism; United States of America; Philanthropy; Feminism (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2008
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (12)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.110 ... d&utm_campaign=repec (text/html)
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.110 ... d&utm_campaign=repec (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eme:aaajpp:v:21:y:2008:i:6:p:765-790
DOI: 10.1108/09513570810893245
Access Statistics for this article
Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal is currently edited by Prof James Guthrie and Prof Lee Parker
More articles in Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal from Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Emerald Support ().