Paradigms and pragmatic constructivism: a reply

Hanne Nørreklit, Lennart Nørreklit and Falconer Mitchell

Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 2010, vol. 23, issue 6, 764-773

Abstract: Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to provide a response to a comment written by Richard Laughlin on a previous paper by the authors, which appeared inAccounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Volume 23 Number 6. Design/methodology/approach - The paper addresses three issues central to the analysis of the comment on their past paper. Findings - In addressing each of the issues in turn the authors clarify their analysis. Originality/value - The paper provides an argument for the development of a paradigm for accounting practice derived from the use of pragmatic constructivism.

Keywords: Pragmatism; Accounting (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.110 ... d&utm_campaign=repec (text/html)
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.110 ... d&utm_campaign=repec (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eme:aaajpp:v:23:y:2010:i:6:p:764-773

DOI: 10.1108/09513571011065862

Access Statistics for this article

Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal is currently edited by Prof James Guthrie and Prof Lee Parker

More articles in Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal from Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Emerald Support ().