The role of nontraditional lending for socially disadvantaged and financially stressed farmers
Tia M. McDonald,
Jonathan Law,
Anil K. Giri and
Dipak Subedi
Agricultural Finance Review, 2021, vol. 82, issue 2, 247-267
Abstract:
Purpose - In recent years, socially disadvantaged farmers and ranchers have increased their usage of nontraditional lending nearly converging to levels of usage observed for nonsocially disadvantaged groups. The purpose of this research is to explore explanations for this trend in lending utilization by socially disadvantaged farmers and ranchers by examining factors that influence credit usage and credit choice. Design/methodology/approach - A multinomial logit is used to estimate the probability of loan choice given characteristics of the producer and farm. Findings - While not a causal analysis, the results suggest that farm characteristics, which differ between socially disadvantaged and nonsocially disadvantaged producers, are associated with a lower likelihood of credit usage by an average socially disadvantaged farmer. For those that have loans, socially disadvantaged producers exhibit higher debt-to-asset ratios and lower current ratios, characteristics that are typically associated with higher than observed probability of usage of loans other than nontraditional. Socially disadvantaged producers also have lower value of assets which is associated with a higher probability of nontraditional loan usage. Originality/value - This research is among the first to examine loan usage of socially disadvantaged producers using nationally representative data.
Keywords: Socially disadvantaged farmers and ranchers; Nontraditional lending; Financial stress (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.110 ... d&utm_campaign=repec (text/html)
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.110 ... d&utm_campaign=repec (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eme:afrpps:afr-06-2021-0072
DOI: 10.1108/AFR-06-2021-0072
Access Statistics for this article
Agricultural Finance Review is currently edited by Valentina Hartarska and Denis Nadolnyak
More articles in Agricultural Finance Review from Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Emerald Support ().