Balance sheet and income statement issues in ARMS
Paul N. Ellinger,
Bruce Ahrendsen and
Charles Moss
Agricultural Finance Review, 2012, vol. 72, issue 2, 247-253
Abstract:
Purpose - The purpose of this research is to analyze possible implications of the economic measures presented in the balance sheet and income statement of the farm firm. Design/methodology/approach - Accounting principles and the users of accounting information are studied. From a review of the Agricultural Resource Management Survey (ARMS) questionnaire, several items are identified that limit ARMS information from fully measuring economic and financial conditions. Findings - ARMS limitations include issues related to asset valuation, income and expense recognition, and extraordinary income reporting. In particular, data limitations on deferred taxes associated with market values exceeding cost, capital leases, prepaid rents, accrued items, Section 179 and accelerated depreciation methods, and extraordinary items may result in understatement of leverage, overstatement of liquidity, and under reporting of year‐to‐year farm income variability measures. Originality/value - By identifying these limitations, changes can be made that may result in improved measures of farm financial condition and farm household well‐being.
Keywords: Accounting principle; Capital lease; Section 179; Accrued expense; Balance sheet; Farm income; ARMS; Accounting; Farms (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.110 ... d&utm_campaign=repec (text/html)
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.110 ... d&utm_campaign=repec (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eme:afrpps:v:72:y:2012:i:2:p:247-253
DOI: 10.1108/00021461211250474
Access Statistics for this article
Agricultural Finance Review is currently edited by Valentina Hartarska and Denis Nadolnyak
More articles in Agricultural Finance Review from Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Emerald Support ().