EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Accounting for short samples and heterogeneous experience in rating crop insurance

Julia Borman, Barry Goodwin (), Keith Coble, Thomas O. Knight and Roderick Rejesus

Agricultural Finance Review, 2013, vol. 73, issue 1, 88-101

Abstract: Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to be an academic inquiry into rating issues confronted by the US Federal Crop Insurance program stemming from changes in participation rates as well as the weighting of data to reflect longer‐run weather patterns. Design/methodology/approach - The authors investigate two specific approaches that differ from those adopted by the Risk Management Agency, building upon standard maximum likelihood and Bayesian estimation techniques that consider parametric densities for the loss‐cost ratio. Findings - Both approaches indicate that incorporating weights into the priors for Bayesian estimation can inform the distribution. Originality/value - In most cases, the authors' results indicate that including weighting into priors for Bayesian estimation implied lower premium rates than found using standard methods.

Keywords: Crop insurance; Loss distribution; Crops; Insurance (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.110 ... d&utm_campaign=repec (text/html)
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.110 ... d&utm_campaign=repec (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eme:afrpps:v:73:y:2013:i:1:p:88-101

DOI: 10.1108/00021461311321339

Access Statistics for this article

Agricultural Finance Review is currently edited by Valentina Hartarska and Denis Nadolnyak

More articles in Agricultural Finance Review from Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Emerald Support ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eme:afrpps:v:73:y:2013:i:1:p:88-101