Economics as a rhetorical language game

Raquel Mesquita Almeida

EconomiA, 2023, vol. 24, issue 1, 24-43

Abstract: Purpose - This paper aims to argue that Economics is not a neutral science. Design/methodology/approach - Post-structuralist perspective of Lyotard (1984), alongside the Pragmatics of Searle (1979) and Travis (1981) are useful for analyzing enunciations in mainstream Economics. Findings - Economists use illocutionary acts expressed in formal language to achieve perlocutionary effects. Because of the importance attached to objectivity in mainstream Economics, the use of artificial languages is preferred to natural language. However, formal language is preferred regarding its perlocutionary effects on economists' community. Originality/value - This paper puts together the Continental and the Analytical Philosophy and show, in an original manner, how their intersections and how they can be useful to better understand the epistemology of Economics.

Keywords: Rhetorical economics; Philosophy of language; Mathematical formalism; B41; B59 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.110 ... d&utm_campaign=repec (text/html)
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.110 ... d&utm_campaign=repec (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eme:econpp:econ-11-2022-0161

DOI: 10.1108/ECON-11-2022-0161

Access Statistics for this article

EconomiA is currently edited by Professor Joaquim Andrade

More articles in EconomiA from Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Emerald Support ().