Implications of tax audit risk, consequences, aggressive behavior and ethics for compliance
Siew H. Chan and
Qian Song
International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, 2021, vol. 29, issue 5, 823-847
Abstract:
Purpose - This study investigates whether consideration of future consequences (CFC), Machiavellianism (MACH) and the perceived role of ethics and social responsibility (PRESOR) enhance understanding of the impact of tax audit risk on compliance. Design/methodology/approach - A between-subjects experiment is conducted to test the hypotheses. A hypothetical tax audit case (or lack thereof) is used to create a high (low) perceived tax audit risk. The usable responses of 144 participants representing the general taxpayer population are analyzed. Findings - The results suggest that taxpayers with lower CFC, MACH or PRESOR scores are more compliant when tax audit risk is high than low. In contrast, taxpayers with higher CFC, MACH or PRESOR scores are indifferent toward high or low tax audit risk. Research limitations/implications - Research can elicit consideration of future consequences of being detected for taxpayers with lower CFC scores to increase compliance. Additionally, increased saliency of tax audit risk and detection of noncompliance in a tax audit can enhance the compliance of taxpayers with lower MACH scores. Dissemination of information via social media on the value of ethical and social responsibility of compliance can also increase the compliance of taxpayers with higher PRESOR scores. Practical implications - This study helps researchers and the tax authority better understand the complexities of compliance and the ethical dilemmas that taxpayers face, especially when a considerable amount of cash income is involved. To deter underreporting of cash income, the tax authority can use social media to explain how data analytics tools can facilitate the analysis and integration of multiple sources of a taxpayer’s income and expenses. Originality/value - Prior studies present participants with objective tax audit rates, such as 5, 25 and 30 (Culliset al., 2006; Maciejovskyet al., 2007; Trivediet al., 2003) or 50% (Maciejovskyet al., 2012) to investigate tax compliance. However, the actual tax audit rate is very low (about 1%) due to the limited resources of the tax authority (Alm and Torgler, 2011). To attenuate perceptions of unrealistic tax audit rates, this study operationalizes high (low) tax audit risk via a hypothetical tax audit case (or lack thereof) to examine the impact of tax audit risk on compliance.
Keywords: Machiavellianism; Tax compliance; Consideration of future consequences; Perceived role of ethics and social responsibility; Tax audit risk (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.110 ... d&utm_campaign=repec (text/html)
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.110 ... d&utm_campaign=repec (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eme:ijaimp:ijaim-09-2021-0183
DOI: 10.1108/IJAIM-09-2021-0183
Access Statistics for this article
International Journal of Accounting & Information Management is currently edited by Dr Xin (Robert) Luo and Professor Han Donker
More articles in International Journal of Accounting & Information Management from Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Emerald Support ().