Determinants ofShari’ahgovernance disclosure in financial institutions

Toseef Azid and Ali A. Alnodel

International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 2018, vol. 35, issue 2, 207-226

Abstract: Purpose - This paper aims to investigate factors influencingShari’ahgovernance disclosure (SGD) in financial institutions. Design/methodology/approach - Using content analysis approach, 46 annual reports published in 2015 by banks and insurance companies were investigated based on a self-constructed disclosure index. Findings - The results show that the average level of voluntary disclosure ofShari’ahgovernance in Saudi financial institutions is 11.7 per cent, which is lower than expectations Moreover, regression analysis shows that industry type, ownership structure and board composition significantly determine the extent of voluntary disclosure ofShari’ahgovernance. Local financial institutions which are owned by non-governmental agencies are more likely to disclose voluntarily theirShari’ahgovernance, in particular from the banking industry. Research limitations/implications - It also bridges the gap between theory and practice and can be used to practice economic and commercial impact in teaching to influence public policy in research contributing to the body of knowledge and especially for the insurance sector and government. Social implications - It provides guidance to the ethical investors and supports them in the decision-making process. Originality/value - This research extends the investigation of SGD into insurance sector in a country that has a general policy about adhering to Islamic principles. Financial institutions might go beyond the country affirmations to legitimate their identity in response to the society critiques about the issue. Accordingly, internal attributes and strategies of financial institutions may play a significant role in distinguishing its compliance with Islamic principles to respond to the society critiques about financial transactions.

Keywords: Saudi Arabia; Voluntary disclosure; Shari’ah compliance; Insurance sector; Tawhidi methodology (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.110 ... d&utm_campaign=repec (text/html)
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.110 ... d&utm_campaign=repec (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eme:ijoesp:ijoes-07-2018-0111

DOI: 10.1108/IJOES-07-2018-0111

Access Statistics for this article

International Journal of Ethics and Systems is currently edited by Prof Jacob Dahl Rendtorff

More articles in International Journal of Ethics and Systems from Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Emerald Support ().