EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The impact of Sarbanes–Oxley and Dodd–Frank on executive compensation

Linda Hughen, Mahfuja Malik and Eunsup Daniel Shim

Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 2019, vol. 20, issue 3, 243-266

Abstract: Purpose - The recent economic and political focus on rising income inequality and the extent of government intervention into pay policies has renewed the interest in executive compensation. The purpose of this paper is to examine the impact of changing regulatory landscapes on executive pay and its components. Design/methodology/approach - This study examines a recent 23-year period divided into three distinct intervals separated by two major regulatory changes, the Sarbanes–Oxley Act (SOX) and the Dodd–Frank Act. Bonus, long-term and total compensation are separately modeled as a function of each regulatory change while controlling for firm size, performance and year. The model is estimated using panel data with firm fixed effects. An industry analysis is also conducted to examine sector variations. Findings - Total compensation increased 29 percent following SOX and 21 percent following Dodd–Frank, above what can be explained by size, firm performance and time. Total compensation increased following both SOX and Dodd–Frank in all industries except for the financial services industry where total compensation was unchanged. Results are robust to using smaller windows around each regulation. Research limitations/implications - This study does not seek to determine whether executive compensation is at an optimal level at any point in time. Instead, this study focuses only on the change in executive compensation after two specific regulations. Originality/value - The debate over the extent to which the government should intervene with executive compensation has become a frequent part of political and non-political discourse. This paper provides evidence that over the long-term, regulation does not curtail executive compensation. An important exception is that total compensation was restrained for financial services firms following the Dodd–Frank Act.

Keywords: Performance measurement; Dodd–Frank Act; Sarbanes–Oxley Act; Executive compensation; Pay-for-performance; M41; M52; M55 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.emeraldinsight.com/10.1108/JAAR-01-2018 ... RePEc&WT.mc_id=RePEc (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eme:jaarpp:jaar-01-2018-0015

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Emerald Group Publishing, Howard House, Wagon Lane, Bingley, BD16 1WA, UK
http://emeraldgroupp ... journals.htm?id=jaar

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Applied Accounting Research is currently edited by Julia Mundy

More articles in Journal of Applied Accounting Research from Emerald Group Publishing
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Virginia Chapman ().

 
Page updated 2019-09-14
Handle: RePEc:eme:jaarpp:jaar-01-2018-0015