Is conditional conservatism a source of deviations of financial statements from Benford's Law?

Tri Tri Nguyen, Chau Minh Duong and Nguyet Thi Minh Nguyen

Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 2022, vol. 23, issue 5, 1024-1046

Abstract: Purpose - In this paper, the authors examine the association between conditional conservatism and deviations of the first digits of financial statement items from what are expected by Benford's Law. Design/methodology/approach - This research uses data of companies listed on the London Stock Exchange. The authors measure deviations of first digits from Benford's Law following Amiramet al. (2015) and firm-year conditional conservatism following previous studies (Basu, 1997; Khan and Watts, 2009; García Laraet al., 2016). The authors use multiple regressions to provide evidence for their hypothesis. Findings - The results show that conditional conservatism is positively associated with deviations from Benford's Law. The findings are robust across different measures of deviations and conditional conservatism. Also, the authors find that the relationship between deviations from Benford's Law and conditional conservatism is more pronounced for firms with debt issuance, and for leveraged firms facing financial distress. Next, the authors’ analyses confirm previous evidence by showing that the first digits of financial statement items of UK listed companies conform to Benford's Law at the firm-specific level and the market level, and deviations of income statements are larger than those of balance sheets and cash flow statements. Research limitations/implications - The research makes significant contributions to the literature. First, this is the first study that provides empirical evidence suggesting that conditional conservatism may be a source of deviations from Benford’s Law. Second, the authors provide evidence confirming previous US findings (e.g. Amiramet al., 2015) showing that the distributions of first digits of financial statement items of UK listed companies also conform to Benford's Law. Practical implications - The authors’ findings have implications for auditors. Auditors should be aware of “false positive” for material misstatements when using Benford's Law as a risk assessment procedure. While both conditional conservatism and earnings management are related to deviations from Benford's Law, conservatism-related biases could indicate less audit risks. Originality/value - The authors provide new and original evidence suggesting that conditional conservatism is related to deviations from Benford's Law.

Keywords: Benford's Law; Earnings management; Conditional conservatism (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.110 ... d&utm_campaign=repec (text/html)
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.110 ... d&utm_campaign=repec (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eme:jaarpp:jaar-02-2021-0037

DOI: 10.1108/JAAR-02-2021-0037

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Applied Accounting Research is currently edited by Associate Professor Orthodoxia Kyriacou

More articles in Journal of Applied Accounting Research from Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Emerald Support ().