Effective methods for detecting fraudulent financial reporting: practical insights from Big 4 auditors

Rasha Kassem and Kamil Omoteso

Journal of Accounting Literature, 2023, vol. 46, issue 4, 587-610

Abstract: Purpose - Using a qualitative grounded theory approach, this study explores the methods experienced external auditors use to detect fraudulent financial reporting (FFR) during standard audits. Design/methodology/approach - Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 24 experienced external auditors to explore the methods they used to detect FFR successfully during standard external audits. Findings - The authors find 58 methods used for FFR detection, out of which the following methods are frequently used and help in detecting more than one type of FFR: (1) specific analytical procedures, (2) positive confirmation, (3) understanding of the client's business and industry, (4) the inspection of specific documents, (5) a detailed analysis of the audit client's anti-fraud controls and (6) investigating tip-offs from suppliers, employees and customers. Research limitations/implications - Based on the grounded theory approach, the authors theorise that auditors must return to the basics and focus on specific audit procedures highlighted in this study for effective fraud detection. Practical implications - The study provides practical guidance, including 58 methods used in audit practice to detect FFR. This knowledge can improve auditors' skills in detecting material misstatements due to fraud. Besides, analytical procedures and positive confirmation helped external auditors in this study detect all forms of FFR, yet they are overlooked in the external audit practice. Therefore, audit firms should emphasise the significance of these audit procedures in their professional audit training programmes. Audit regulators should advise auditors to consider positive confirmation instead of negative confirmation in financial audits to increase the likelihood of FFR detection. Moreover, audit standards (ISA 240 and SAS 99) should explicitly require auditors to conduct a detailed analysis of the client's anti-fraud controls. Originality/value - This is the first study to identify actual, effective methods used by external auditors in detecting FFR during the ordinary course of an audit.

Keywords: Grounded theory; Fraudulent financial reporting; Fraud risk assessment; Fraud detection methods; External auditors (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.110 ... d&utm_campaign=repec (text/html)
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.110 ... d&utm_campaign=repec (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eme:jalpps:jal-03-2023-0055

DOI: 10.1108/JAL-03-2023-0055

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Accounting Literature is currently edited by Professor Martina Linnenluecke and Professor Tom Smith

More articles in Journal of Accounting Literature from Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Emerald Support ().